Subject: Re: [boost] is review system in place is extremely slow? (was Re: [rfc] rcpp)
From: Daniel James (dnljms_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-02-28 12:39:48
On 28 February 2010 16:47, Paul A. Bristow <pbristow_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> But nobody has yet responded to the vital question of whether there are
> resources to support a parallel tree to trunk,
> in addition to sandbox, for what we are calling 'candidate' libraries.
I think I did a while ago. The sandbox used to be organised as a
parallel tree to the main tree (in CVS). It ended up a complete mess.
If someone's willing to actively maintain it, then that might be
averted, but experience suggests that they won't.
But using separate repositories is a much better organisation anyway,
it means that your history doesn't get all messed up as it does in
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk