|
|
Boost : |
Subject: Re: [boost] is review system in place is extremely slow? (was Re: [rfc] rcpp)
From: Paul A. Bristow (pbristow_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-03-08 05:04:12
> -----Original Message-----
> From: boost-bounces_at_[hidden] [mailto:boost-bounces_at_[hidden]] On
Behalf Of
> Mathias Gaunard
> Sent: Sunday, March 07, 2010 9:16 PM
> To: boost_at_[hidden]
> Subject: Re: [boost] is review system in place is extremely slow? (was Re:
[rfc] rcpp)
>
> Paul A. Bristow a écrit :
>
> > Or is it best on rely on authors running their own tests whenever they make
some
> > changes? So users should be able to rely on
> > WYSIWYG?
>
> I think it's important to not depend on authors, as they could all have
> a different setup, making managing the repository according to disparate
> results more difficult.
I agree that the testing structure should be as the trunk testing.
But actually running regular (daily) tests may be too big a cost.
(There will be many more things to test than trunk).
Perhaps a weekly or monthly testing schedule would suffice?
Paul
--- Paul A. Bristow Prizet Farmhouse Kendal, UK LA8 8AB +44 1539 561830, mobile +44 7714330204 pbristow_at_[hidden]
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk