Re: [boost] [log] Review attempt

Subject: Re: [boost] [log] Review attempt
From: Roland Bock (rbock_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-03-09 16:40:23

Andrey Semashev wrote:
> On 03/09/2010 10:48 PM, Michael Caisse wrote:
>> Andrey Semashev wrote:
>>>
>>> These parsers do, indeed, give a hard time to compilers. I tried to
>>> reduce the footprint but apparently some compilers still barely cope
>>> with them. Not sure what can be done, but I'll try to experiment some
>>> more. Suggestions from Boost.Spirit gurus are welcome. :)
>>>
>>
>> Would you be willing to move to Spirit 2.1 and away from classic? I
>> could offer a patch once my work load frees up some.
>
> If it does offer better compile times, I'm willing to try. I just 
> haven't had any real experience with Spirit 2.x before. The patch 
> would be much appreciated. :)

There's a page with migration hints:

http://www.boost.org/doc/libs/1_41_0/libs/spirit/doc/html/spirit/notes/porting_from_spirit_1_8_x.html

I assume that the Spirit experts will be able to re-write that code with 
ease.