Re: [boost] [log] Review attempt

Subject: Re: [boost] [log] Review attempt
From: OvermindDL1 (overminddl1_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-03-10 21:16:20

On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 2:40 PM, Roland Bock <rbock_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> Andrey Semashev wrote:
>>
>> On 03/09/2010 10:48 PM, Michael Caisse wrote:
>>>
>>> Andrey Semashev wrote:
>>>>
>>>> These parsers do, indeed, give a hard time to compilers. I tried to
>>>> reduce the footprint but apparently some compilers still barely cope
>>>> with them. Not sure what can be done, but I'll try to experiment some
>>>> more. Suggestions from Boost.Spirit gurus are welcome. :)
>>>>
>>>
>>> Would you be willing to move to Spirit 2.1 and away from classic? I
>>> could offer a patch once my work load frees up some.
>>
>> If it does offer better compile times, I'm willing to try. I just haven't
>> had any real experience with Spirit 2.x before. The patch would be much
>> appreciated. :)
>
> There's a page with migration hints:
>
> http://www.boost.org/doc/libs/1_41_0/libs/spirit/doc/html/spirit/notes/porting_from_spirit_1_8_x.html
>
> I assume that the Spirit experts will be able to re-write that code with
> ease.

Why yes, yes we can.  :)
I did not know you were using a rather ancient version, I would have
rewritten that already if I knew you were using Spirit at all.  I have
not been paying too much attention to all this review process, so if
you can give me the SVN link to the latest version, I can rewrite the
Spirit code to use the *much* faster Spirit2.1, it will both compile
and execute faster, and I can submit a patch.  I am craving doing some
programming.  Been *so* busy with stuff recently that I have not been
able to do much, other then moving in to my new place I actually have
some free time again so I can do this.