Boost logo

Boost :

Subject: Re: [boost] [Boost.Locale] New Release
From: Artyom (artyomtnk_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-03-12 00:01:34

> I believe that almost the very first thing you should
> explain is what is added/changed between std::locale and its
> facets and Boost.Locale.

It is mentioned here:

Where I explain what is standard localization system is missing.

> Also since you mention date/time functionality you should
> explain what Boost.Locale offers compared to
> Boost.date_time.
> These are just suggestions, but when you offer a library
> and there are other well known similar libraries around, I
> think it is important to distinguish your library's
> functionality from others.

I mentioned it one of the first sentences here:

boos::date_time works only with Gregorian calendar while boost::locale
provides transparent support of many others like Hebrew, Islamic,
Japanese etc.



Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at