Subject: Re: [boost] [log] Boost.Log formal review
From: Roland Bock (rbock_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-03-12 08:58:51
Stewart, Robert wrote:
> It is theoretical as we don't yet know what any Boost library (or other generic library) might wish to log. Barend raised the issue, presumably because he was interested in logging from his library. I know that we log a good deal from our internal libraries, but they aren't libraries like those in Boost. What would prove unacceptable is for each Boost library wishing to log something to create its own API for doing so, unless the number of such libraries is close to one.
I certainly agree that IF any boost library would want to log, we should
discuss in which way to do it. It is just that I fail to see which one
would actually want that.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk