Subject: Re: [boost] boost::log review (printf style api)
From: Steven Watanabe (watanabesj_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-03-14 20:54:21
Vladimir Batov wrote:
> I second that. If we want the library to be anything beyond an
> academic toy, it has to be practical and deployed, it should to be
> easy to retrofit such new library into *existing* projects. The
> ovewhelming majority of the projects I've been involved in use
> printf-style formating for logging. On a large scale the
> std::stream-style formatting failed miserably and programmers (well,
> at least those I worked with) voted with their feet/hends/whatever.
The library does support Boost.Format.