Subject: Re: [boost] static in_class constants
From: Mateusz Loskot (mateusz_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-03-15 12:36:30
Herve Bronnimann wrote:
> Someone is bound to reply this sooner or later so I thought I might:
> it's a bad idea because of (see below). Boost convention uses m_ prefix
> for members.
Is this m_ prefix convention documented anywhere?
The development guidelines do not mention it.
The only reference I find to m_ prefix is
-- Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net