Re: [boost] static in_class constants

Subject: Re: [boost] static in_class constants
From: Steven Watanabe (watanabesj_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-03-15 12:38:04

AMDG

Herve Bronnimann wrote:
> Someone is bound to reply this sooner or later so I thought I might: 
> it's a bad idea because of (see below). Boost convention uses m_ 
> prefix for members.  Cheers, HB 

For public members, I'm pretty sure that all Boost libraries just use
an ordinary name with no special decoration.  For private members,
there is no Boost-wide convention.

In Christ,
Steven Watanabe