Subject: Re: [boost] Fwd: Re: [log] review part 1
From: Andrey Semashev (andrey.semashev_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-03-15 14:52:33
On 03/15/2010 07:13 PM, Zachary Turner wrote:
> How about "attributor"? This implies that it DOES something, not IS
> something. In particular, it implies that it's used for associating
> attribute values with log records, and is also somewhat concise.
Is it a valid English word?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk