Re: [boost] Fwd: Re: [log] review part 1

Subject: Re: [boost] Fwd: Re: [log] review part 1
From: Roland Bock (rbock_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-03-15 15:04:25

Andrey Semashev wrote:
> On 03/15/2010 07:13 PM, Zachary Turner wrote:
>> How about "attributor"?  This implies that it DOES something, not IS
>> something.  In particular, it implies that it's used for associating
>> attribute values with log records, and is also somewhat concise.
>
> Is it a valid English word?
I don't think so, but well, neither is functor.

I liked the term immediately :-)