Boost logo

Boost :

Subject: Re: [boost] Boost, Decoupled and Accelerated
From: Roland Bock (rbock_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-03-16 16:46:35


David Abrahams wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I know I'm not the first person to notice that, as Boost has grown, it
> has become harder and harder to manage, Subversion is getting slow,
> our issue tracker is full to overflowing, and the release process is a
> full-time job. For me, this situation has taken a lot of the fun out
> of participating. It's time to make Boost development fun again.
>
Not sure how much time I can offer, but I'd like to contribute to
testing on Linux. At my company, we have some hundred modules (mostly
libraries and plugins) with a nice amount of dependencies. Our current
build system is based on CMake. I'd be interested in seeing how the two
systems compare, and (maybe) offering one or two suggestions, too...

A question from a user and occasional contributor to the overflowing bug
tracker, hoping that you can provide an answer without compromising the
dramatics for BoostCon :-)

How could decentralization influence the overflowing bug tracker?

Regards,

Roland


Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk