Re: [boost] GSoC 2010 - Boost.Phoenix

Subject: Re: [boost] GSoC 2010 - Boost.Phoenix
From: Joel de Guzman (joel_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-03-20 23:06:25

On 3/21/2010 1:07 AM, joel falcou wrote:
> Thomas Heller wrote:
>> Hi Joel,
>>
>> Thank you for the wiki url. I will dive into that.
>> Some general questions:
>> - The interface should be (more or less) the same as phoenix V2?
> It has to be the same to minimize disruption. If anythign need to be
> changed for accomodating
> some inenr changes, it'll have to be discussed.
>> - The main extention point for a user should be phoenix::functions?
> we wanted to have more extension scenario, like simplifying how to make
> new actor (like let's say I want to add new control structure
> or new palceholder-like actor with special member). The problem is in
> fact hidign proto internals in a pretty way so user wntign to extend
> don't have to master Proto.
>> - What exactly to you want to have in the proposal? function/class
>> interfaces?
>> general description of phoenix?
> Good question. Let's see what Joel or Harmut have to say on the matter.

To be honest, I am not entilrely sure I understand the question.
Perhaps I lost the context here. Could you elaborate? Do you mean
to ask about the scope of the proposal?

Regards,
-- 
Joel de Guzman
http://www.boostpro.com
http://spirit.sf.net
http://www.facebook.com/djowel
Meet me at BoostCon
http://www.boostcon.com/home
http://www.facebook.com/boostcon