Boost logo

Boost :

Subject: Re: [boost] The problems with Boost development
From: Artyom (artyomtnk_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-03-21 00:55:14


> >
> > The point where that breaks down is where one library
> is found to have a fatal flaw shortly after a release, you
> wait 6 months (or whatever) for another version of boost
> which fixes the bug, but also breaks the API on a half-dozen
> other libraries you use.
>
> This is then really a problem with testing if such a
> disastrous bug slips through?

I think that it is terribly wrong assume that Boost can release any kind
of bug-free library even free from terrible, critical bugs that make
the library useless. It is programming world. There is no such thing like
bug free software. See UUID example...

Artyom

      


Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk