Subject: Re: [boost] Should Boost adopt pimpl/d-pointer as much as it can?
From: DE (satan66613_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-03-22 15:17:01
on 21.03.2010 at 23:16
Artyom wrote :
> I would only rephrase you a little:
> in order to avoid the myriad of problems
> involved in ensuring that boost libraries are compiled with
> **one specific** compiler on **one** specific operating system
> where compiler run-times are not backward compatible between releases
> and even between debug/release builds, where is
> no standard naming conventions for various libraries types even exists,
> and building shared library requires extraordinary skills and lots
> of non-trivial configuration macros in order to get it done right.
this is the reality we are living in
> But still, I think that creation of header only libraries just in order
> to simplify build procedures, IMHO, are just not justified.
> Libraries are not designed for simple users they are designed for
> developers that should be capable to solve these problems.
i strongly diagree with you
i think one should strive to make his library open to as many users as
it is possible, not only pro developers
that is the scourge of modern software engineering (as i understand it)
modern tools are so complicated that only very experienced programmers
can handle it
please don't make things worse than they are!
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk