Subject: Re: [boost] [GSoC] Boost.XML
From: Andrew Sutton (andrew.n.sutton_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-03-22 18:32:06
> Well, I'm interested :)
> True. OK, let me put it this way: The goal here should be to define an API.
> I have an existing implementation that wraps libxml2. I welcome any
> proposal for alternate implementations / backends. Be warned, though, that I
> consider XML compliance a prerequisite, not an optional feature. :-)
Well, apparently my background knowledge isn't up to par :) but I still
think this is a good GSoC project.
I'm curious to see what Ilie is taking from this discussion. Hopefully we're
not scaring people away ;)
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk