Re: [boost] 5 Observations - My experience with the boost libraries

Subject: Re: [boost] 5 Observations - My experience with the boost libraries
From: Stefan Seefeld (seefeld_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-03-23 23:04:04

On 03/23/2010 10:52 PM, Tom Brinkman wrote:
> Thanks.
>
> I took a quick at at this library's requirements.
>
> The vsiplplusplus library uses IPP and MKL, which are both just "C"
> libraries that wrap the low level hardware intrinsics necessary to
> create accelerated graphics code.   Still just plain "C" though.  I
> know this because I've worked with the IPP guys.
>
> vsiplplusplus appears to be just like every other C++ graphics
> library, in that it just puts a pretty C++ face onto an otherwise ugly
> C graphics library.
>    

I have said it once, and I'm saying it again: Sourcery VSIPL++ is not a 
"graphics library". Your description above is not only inaccurate, it is 
plain wrong. You seem to be blinded by your own unsubstantiated believes.

Please take this "C++ is bad" nonsense elsewhere.

Thanks,
         Stefan

-- 
       ...ich hab' noch einen Koffer in Berlin...