Subject: Re: [boost] [log] Boost.Log formal review
From: Vladimir Prus (ghost_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-03-24 06:54:24
On Tuesday 16 March 2010 22:39:56 barend wrote:
> This answer:
> > Which probably means that the decision is with the author(s) of each
> > individual library.
> (from the review manager) surprised me a bit, I think that in a library
> under review such an important thing may certainly be discussed,
> per library.
Of course, it "may" be discussed, but there's no reason to believe that
such discussion, in context of Boost.Log library, will lead to any agreement,
given that no such agreement was ever achieved in past regarding other libraries
or general guidelines.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk