Subject: Re: [boost] Guidelines on wiki
From: Daniel James (dnljms_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-03-25 16:25:24
Sorry about the very slow reply.
> Robert Ramey:
>> It's a little unclear whether this kind of stuff should be in the wiki
>> or the regular website. I find the website hard to update and often
>> hard to navigate. So I like the wiki. But then, I'm a tiny bit concerned
>> that given the ease of editing the wiki, it might tend to expand
>> "all over the place".
Hopefully people with subversion access will be disciplined. But I
think you're right, it should be someone's responsibility to oversee
the wiki and keep things ordered. I think this page demonstrates that:
>> Thinking about about, I think the former is a better model as I
>> believe it will better model boost itself in the future. So you might
>> want to expand your horizons a little to consider how the wiki
>> might include a lot more of the information which is currently on
>> the web site.
Yes, I plan to move more content there.
> Paul A. Bristow:
> Editing is *much* easier - by anyone - but also vulnerable to instability and
Hopefully not, since it's password protected.
> Can we copy a snapshot of the wiki to the (definitely read-only) Boost site with
> every release?
My original plan was to just use the wiki, but I think you might
right. By using snapshots, viewing the page will be faster and it'll
allow people to freely edit the wiki pages. The workflow would be
something like: edit the page, ask on the list for a review, if
accepted the website manager imports the snapshot. Sounds okay?
> I've not found Google's indexing to work too well with my questions (often when
> I know that the answer is there somewhere).
> Searching the wiki pages is faster and often more effective (because you've
> narrowed the searchable stuff - assuming you have the right 'page').
If all the pages are under the same subdirectory we can limit the search e.g.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk