|
Boost : |
Subject: Re: [boost] gil::io "non-review" (was: [gil] Can not open test.jpg)
From: Tom Brinkman (reportbase2007_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-03-25 17:37:04
On Linux, where I develop, we use PNG. As far as i know, the
following library is pretty much the standard way to interface with
PNG's.
http://www.karlings.com/~danne/pnglite/
It was written by the original png developers, but has a simpler
interface. Should be adequate for your purposes. Just grab what you
can.
On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 2:18 PM, Phil Endecott
<spam_from_boost_dev_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> Christian Henning wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Also, how would a C++ wrapper help you with large images?
>>>
>>> My point is that your gil interface doesn't help me with large images in
>>> limited RAM, and your current design is "all or nothing". ?Decomposing it
>>> into wrappers around the libraries that are independently useful would
>>> mean
>>> that I could use them directly and get the benefit of e.g. the error
>>> handling stuff, with my own row-at-a-time code on top.
>>
>> Imagine for now libjpeg doesn't allow for partial image decoding. How
>> would you solve that problem?
>
> I'm not sure what you mean by "that problem" in that question. Do you just
> mean "processing large images in limited RAM"? If you do, the answer is
> that I would just process the image sequentially, e.g. row-at-a-time. For
> operations like scaling and tiling this is straightforward.
>
>> My solution might be to create a virtual
>> image container which only holds a certain amount of an image in
>> memory and the rest on the hard drive. Though, while reading a large
>> image this container will handle limit memory situation on the fly.
>
> Well my digital picture frame doesn't have a hard drive. You seem to be
> over-thinking this a bit!
>
>> I have been glancing over libjepg documentation. One of the advanced
>> feature is called "Buffered-image mode". It goes like this:
>>
>> "In buffered-image mode, the library stores the partially decoded image in
>> a
>> coefficient buffer, from which it can be read out as many times as
>> desired.
>> This mode is typically used for incremental display of progressive JPEG
>> files,
>> but it can be used with any JPEG file. Each scan of a progressive JPEG
>> file
>> adds more data (more detail) to the buffered image. The application can
>> display in lockstep with the source file (one display pass per input
>> scan),
>> or it can allow input processing to outrun display processing. By making
>> input and display processing run independently, it is possible for the
>> application to adapt progressive display to a wide range of data
>> transmission
>> rates."
>>
>> Do you think this feature can be used to read out sub-images?
>
> Perhaps.
>
>
> Phil.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Unsubscribe & other changes:
> http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
>
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk