Subject: Re: [boost] Library dependencies and intrer-library code reuse
From: Daniel James (dnljms_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-03-26 06:30:51
On 26 March 2010 08:11, David Abrahams <dave_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> Untangling (and minimizing) intra-library dependencies is certainly
> doablethe untangling part has already been done
> (http://gitorious.org/boost)but you proposed something more radical
> and probably impossible when you consider the pimpl/header-only
> requirement. A pimpl-based type traits library?
I don't think it's a good idea to divide boost up based on the current
directory structure. We really should sort out the structure of boost
before splitting it up, not after.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk