Subject: Re: [boost] boost GSoC XML
From: Qingli Ma (qinglics_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-03-28 22:49:47
A simplified one is interesting!
I think here we did not need a simplified one but one that can serves the
interface that is listed in Boost.XML.
2010/3/29 Rob Riggs <rob_at_[hidden]>
> On 03/28/2010 06:01 AM, Qingli Ma wrote:
>> Hi !
>> I have studied some XML parses both in C++ and Java.
>> After comparing with each other, I think that the API interface
>> are more or less the same, however the performance and the
>> complexity of programming is different.
>> So I think mine is to improve the performance and make XML
>> related programming easier.
>> I decide that I am going to make a backend that supports the
>> Reader and the dom interface. I've asked advice from my teachers
>> and he think I am capable of such a job.
> Is anyone working on a simplified C++ API for XML, maybe something inspired
> by Groovy's XmlSlurper or Python's ElementTree API?
> Unsubscribe & other changes: