Re: [boost] New Boost.XInt Library, request preliminary review

Subject: Re: [boost] New Boost.XInt Library, request preliminary review
From: Scott McMurray (me22.ca+boost_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-03-30 19:34:32

On 30 March 2010 17:49, Christopher Jefferson <chris_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>
> On 30 Mar 2010, at 22:47, Scott McMurray wrote:
>>
>> The library *does* impose a limit: It has to allocate space, so
>> there's necessarily the limit implied by the size of the type passed
>> to the allocator to request the space.
>>
>
> By the same argument, should we changed the hashed containers to "dynamically unspecified size hashed containers"?
>

Can you elaborate?

Your question makes me think of the "unordered_" prefix, which I can't
mentally link to the discussion of boundedness.