Re: [boost] Second iteration of Boost.XInt library uploaded, requesting further comments

Subject: Re: [boost] Second iteration of Boost.XInt library uploaded, requesting further comments
From: DE (satan66613_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-03-31 14:03:03

looking at implementation: don't you want to make global integer
constants members of enum(s)? as well as static integer constants
(haven't noticed so far)

i think that

  enum {
    bits_per_digit = whatever_it_is,
    digit_hibit = so_does_this,
    etc
  };

is better than global objects (defined in a header)

to prove me wrong try to compile two source files including "xint.hpp"
and using xint::integer (just for sure) and link them together
i expect linker complaints about entities defined in several object
files

-- 
Pavel
P.S.
if you notice a grammar mistake or weird phrasing in my message
please point it out