Boost logo

Boost :

Subject: Re: [boost] [GSOC] summary of .BigInt library details.
From: Bruno Lalande (bruno.lalande_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-04-01 08:44:02


OK I see, thanks.

Ankit, if your goal is to create a brand new BigInt type, then your
point 2 "backend implemented with the help Boost.Math" is not exactly
valid. Boost.Math provides bindings, that is wrappers around existing
arbitrary precision types provided by 3rd party libraries. It provides
a way to write functions that can take either such types or
fundamental types as parameter. So you wouldn't really *use*
Boost.Math binding, it's even the contrary: ideally you would provide
the necessary interface to ensure compatibility with Boost.Math
bindings.

As for the Proto frontend, something like that is not tight to this
particular BigInt type but is something that would be useful for any
backend actually. So it might rather make sense to implement that as
an extra layer upon Boost.Math bindings so that any backend can
leverage it.

So to summarize, I can see 3 distinct actions:
1) implement your BigInt backend
2) provide a Boost.Math binding compliant interface for this backend
3) implement a frontend for Boost.Math binding based on Boost.Proto

So 1)+2) can be one GSoC project, and 3) another one, actually. Makes sense?

Bruno


Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk