Boost logo

Boost :

Subject: Re: [boost] Transfer of Maintenance Rights
From: vicente.botet (vicente.botet_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-04-01 13:11:52

----- Original Message -----
From: "Gottlob Frege" <gottlobfrege_at_[hidden]>
To: <boost_at_[hidden]>
Sent: Thursday, April 01, 2010 12:56 AM
Subject: Re: [boost] Transfer of Maintenance Rights

>> I understand why you want to avoid the detail. But without this level detail we are unable to state when a library is unmaintained. Or, are we?
> Create a ticket that says 'this library in unmaintained'. If it
> doesn't get looked at it must be true. :-)

Excelent idea.

And what will we do when we see that the library is unmaintained?

I would like we setup something to avoid to reach such a situation. Something that help us to prevent instead of attend.
I support deeply the idea to extend the maintenance to a group.


Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at