Re: [boost] [utility/value_init] boost::value_initialized<T> direct-initialized?

Subject: Re: [boost] [utility/value_init] boost::value_initialized<T> direct-initialized?
From: Niels Dekker - address until 2010-10-10 (niels_address_until_2010-10-10_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-04-03 08:38:23

Jeffrey Lee Hellrung, Jr. wrote:
> Although, echoing Steven: Maybe we should just settle for the
> dead plain simple initialized(const T&) constructor.

I'm not sure if Steven said so, but I certainly did  :-D

Please have a look at the patch I just attached to ticket #3472, having 
the simple initialized(const T&) constructor: 
https://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/attachment/ticket/3472/initialized.patch

Do you think it's okay?

Kind regards,

   Niels
-- 
Niels Dekker
http://www.xs4all.nl/~nd/dekkerware
Scientific programmer at LKEB, Leiden University Medical Center