Subject: Re: [boost] [utility/value_init] boost::value_initialized<T> direct-initialized?
From: Niels Dekker - address until 2010-10-10 (niels_address_until_2010-10-10_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-04-03 08:38:23
Jeffrey Lee Hellrung, Jr. wrote:
> Although, echoing Steven: Maybe we should just settle for the
> dead plain simple initialized(const T&) constructor.
I'm not sure if Steven said so, but I certainly did :-D
Please have a look at the patch I just attached to ticket #3472, having
the simple initialized(const T&) constructor:
Do you think it's okay?
-- Niels Dekker http://www.xs4all.nl/~nd/dekkerware Scientific programmer at LKEB, Leiden University Medical Center
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk