Re: [boost] [utility/value_init] boost::value_initialized<T> direct-initialized?

Subject: Re: [boost] [utility/value_init] boost::value_initialized<T> direct-initialized?
From: Jeffrey Lee Hellrung, Jr. (jhellrung_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-04-03 15:11:10

Niels Dekker - address until 2010-10-10 wrote:
> Jeffrey Lee Hellrung, Jr. wrote:
>> Although, echoing Steven: Maybe we should just settle for the
>> dead plain simple initialized(const T&) constructor.
> 
> I'm not sure if Steven said so, but I certainly did  :-D

Okay, maybe I got the email exchanges confused, my apologies ;)

> Please have a look at the patch I just attached to ticket #3472, having 
> the simple initialized(const T&) constructor: 
> https://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/attachment/ticket/3472/initialized.patch
> 
> Do you think it's okay?

Looks basically like how I had imagined.

- Jeff