Re: [boost] [utility/result_of] decltype-based implementation breaking valid code on msvc-10

Subject: Re: [boost] [utility/result_of] decltype-based implementation breaking valid code on msvc-10
From: Mathias Gaunard (mathias.gaunard_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-04-06 06:02:17

Eric Niebler wrote:

> I suspect the real problem is in a buggy implementation of decltype on 
> msvc-10. For the upcoming boost release, I suggest that we stick with 
> the non-decltype implementation of result_of on msvc-10, or risk 
> massively breaking users' code, not to mention proto, spirit and 
> xpressive on that compiler.

MSVC10 isn't even released yet.
Why bother with a non-stable compiler?