Subject: Re: [boost] [GSoC] Patterns - interest check
From: Mathias Gaunard (mathias.gaunard_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-04-06 10:05:44
Kornel Kisielewicz wrote:
> Mind you, I'm not trying to convince anyone to the creation of a new
> Boost.Patterns library (although I'd really like to do that if
> possible), instead I'd like to ask you if there's a viable GSoC
> proposal in this post, one that one day might turn into a useful part
> of boost.
I suppose there could be, but I'm not really convinced by the patterns
I'd be more interested in tools and utilities that factor the common
idioms as mixins or macros than in the GoF patterns.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk