Subject: Re: [boost] [GSoC] Patterns - interest check
From: Kornel Kisielewicz (kornel.kisielewicz_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-04-06 13:10:59
On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 4:05 PM, Mathias Gaunard
> Kornel Kisielewicz wrote:
>> Mind you, I'm not trying to convince anyone to the creation of a new
>> Boost.Patterns library (although I'd really like to do that if
>> possible), instead I'd like to ask you if there's a viable GSoC
>> proposal in this post, one that one day might turn into a useful part
>> of boost.
> I suppose there could be, but I'm not really convinced by the patterns
> you're proposing.
Suggestions for others really welcome!
> I'd be more interested in tools and utilities that factor the common idioms
> as mixins or macros than in the GoF patterns.
I was thinking on those lines too, I wonder however how many useful
mixins could one come up with. Most of the most useful ones can't be
implemented in C++ cleanly, or are already covered by C++11.
-- regards, Kornel Kisielewicz
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk