Re: [boost] decltype and incomplete types

Subject: Re: [boost] decltype and incomplete types
From: Daniel Walker (daniel.j.walker_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-04-08 17:08:56

On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 2:44 PM, Daniel James <dnljms_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> On 8 April 2010 19:18, Eric Niebler <eric_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>>
>> Now, I'd like to re-raise the issue of commenting out for now the
>> decltype-based implementation of result_of both on trunk and release. This
>> is time-critical and a blocker for proto, xpressive and spirit on msvc-10,
>> gcc in c++0x mode, and any other compiler that implements decltype. Let's do
>> it on trunk, see what breaks (nothing, I hope) and try to get it in 1.43. We
>> can always revert later.
>
> The decltype implementation was only recently merged to release, we
> can just revert the merge.

I suppose it's fine to revert the merge. Some compilers are already
shipping with a std::result_of that implements the current draft
standard. So boost::result_of isn't so critical for these users.

Daniel Walker