Subject: Re: [boost] decltype and incomplete types
From: Daniel James (dnljms_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-04-08 14:44:17
On 8 April 2010 19:18, Eric Niebler <eric_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> Now, I'd like to re-raise the issue of commenting out for now the
> decltype-based implementation of result_of both on trunk and release. This
> is time-critical and a blocker for proto, xpressive and spirit on msvc-10,
> gcc in c++0x mode, and any other compiler that implements decltype. Let's do
> it on trunk, see what breaks (nothing, I hope) and try to get it in 1.43. We
> can always revert later.
The decltype implementation was only recently merged to release, we
can just revert the merge.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk