Subject: Re: [boost] Crypto Proposal
From: Stewart, Robert (Robert.Stewart_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-04-14 13:44:26
Chad Seibert wrote:
> I don't know what this means in terms of the project -
> whether we'll go with a different project or just borrow bits
> from Botan. I am truly sorry I didn't look into this earlier;
> it was entirely my fault and I apologize for not looking into
> this issue earlier.
It seems that your goal should be to capture concepts and write components that can be composed, according to those concepts, to produce useful products. If Botan's license permits you to reuse existing functionality, repackaged in this new way, then the implementation will be relatively easy. Whether there's any point in maintaining a relationship with Botan after that point is a separate issue. It is certainly clear, however, that the library should not be named "Boost.Botan."
Rob Stewart robert.stewart_at_[hidden]
Software Engineer, Core Software using std::disclaimer;
Susquehanna International Group, LLP http://www.sig.com
IMPORTANT: The information contained in this email and/or its attachments is confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately by reply and immediately delete this message and all its attachments. Any review, use, reproduction, disclosure or dissemination of this message or any attachment by an unintended recipient is strictly prohibited. Neither this message nor any attachment is intended as or should be construed as an offer, solicitation or recommendation to buy or sell any security or other financial instrument. Neither the sender, his or her employer nor any of their respective affiliates makes any warranties as to the completeness or accuracy of any of the information contained herein or that this message or any of its attachments is free of viruses.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk