Subject: Re: [boost] [GSoC][Phoenix3] Regarding mutability of arguments passed to phoenix expressions
From: Stewart, Robert (Robert.Stewart_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-04-28 13:43:43
Eric Niebler wrote:
> On 4/28/2010 10:19 AM, Mathias Gaunard wrote:
> > Thomas Heller wrote:
> >> Regarding arguments to phoenix expressions there are two
> >> possibilities.
> >> The first is: Arguments are mutable. The current phoenix is
> >> implemented to be able to this.
> We now have lambdas in C++0x. IMO, we should be paying
> attention to the
> default semantics of lambdas which, IIRC, accept their arguments by
> value(?), and have special syntax for accepting their arguments by
> reference. Someone should correct me if I got that backwards. In the
The introducer uses & before names to get references. By value is the default.
> long haul, I think this will satisfy the Principle of Least Surprise.
Rob Stewart robert.stewart_at_[hidden]
Software Engineer, Core Software using std::disclaimer;
Susquehanna International Group, LLP http://www.sig.com
IMPORTANT: The information contained in this email and/or its attachments is confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately by reply and immediately delete this message and all its attachments. Any review, use, reproduction, disclosure or dissemination of this message or any attachment by an unintended recipient is strictly prohibited. Neither this message nor any attachment is intended as or should be construed as an offer, solicitation or recommendation to buy or sell any security or other financial instrument. Neither the sender, his or her employer nor any of their respective affiliates makes any warranties as to the completeness or accuracy of any of the information contained herein or that this message or any of its attachments is free of viruses.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk