Boost :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Subject: [boost] [range][1.43] is boost::get or boost::at missing?
From: vicente.botet (vicente.botet_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-04-29 13:53:21

Next message: Eric Niebler: "Re: [boost] [GSoC] Helping out Phoenix v3"
Previous message: vicente.botet: "Re: [boost] [any] boost::get style accessors"
Next in thread: Neil Groves: "Re: [boost] [range][1.43] is boost::get or boost::at missing?"
Reply: Neil Groves: "Re: [boost] [range][1.43] is boost::get or boost::at missing?"

Hi,
I'm wondering if a checked element access via at() is missing for Random Access ranges.

Best,
_____________________
Vicente Juan Botet Escribá
http://viboes.blogspot.com/

Next message: Eric Niebler: "Re: [boost] [GSoC] Helping out Phoenix v3"
Previous message: vicente.botet: "Re: [boost] [any] boost::get style accessors"
Next in thread: Neil Groves: "Re: [boost] [range][1.43] is boost::get or boost::at missing?"
Reply: Neil Groves: "Re: [boost] [range][1.43] is boost::get or boost::at missing?"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk