Re: [boost] [xint] Third release is ready, requesting preliminary review

Subject: Re: [boost] [xint] Third release is ready, requesting preliminary review
From: Jeffrey Lee Hellrung, Jr. (jhellrung_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-05-02 21:45:59

On 05/02/2010 06:36 PM, Chad Nelson wrote:
> On 05/02/2010 07:20 PM, Jeffrey Lee Hellrung, Jr. wrote:
>> I think it is important to understand what the discrepancy is, because
>> it may be that you're not writing your algorithms in a move-aware way,
>> producing copies unnecessarily.  This wouldn't surprise me if you wrote
>> the original implementations with COW primarily in mind (which I can't
>> blame you for).
>
> I did, of course. But with the exception of operator+ and operator-, I
> don't see anything that could benefit from additional move-specific
> overloads.

Oh, I think I misunderstood your comment in a previous message.  You 
mean you don't see any advantage in modifying the arguments to functions 
other than operator+ and operator-?

- Jeff