Re: [boost] [xint] Boost.Move vs Copy-on-Write timings

Subject: Re: [boost] [xint] Boost.Move vs Copy-on-Write timings
From: Stephan T. Lavavej (stl_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-05-02 21:50:14

[Jeffrey Lee Hellrung, Jr.]
> Would be even better when we can overload member functions on 
> rvalue-ness ;)  But I have no idea how mature that proposal is... :/

That's http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2007/n2439.htm which added ref-qualifiers and was voted into the Working Paper. However, it is not yet implemented in either VC10 or GCC 4.5, as you can see from http://blogs.msdn.com/vcblog/archive/2010/04/06/c-0x-core-language-features-in-vc10-the-table.aspx and http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-4.5/cxx0x_status.html .

Stephan T. Lavavej
Visual C++ Libraries Developer