Re: [boost] [xint] Third release is ready, requesting preliminary review

Subject: Re: [boost] [xint] Third release is ready, requesting preliminary review
From: Chad Nelson (chad.thecomfychair_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-05-03 18:32:21

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 05/03/2010 04:47 PM, Peter Dimov wrote:

>> If that's the case, and GCC is doing that as it should, why would adding
>> move semantics to the library provide any speed increase at all?
> 
> Consider something like [...]

Thanks, but I can't relate any of that to the reason for my question,
which was whether the compiler would somehow magically use emulated move
semantics if I just included Boost.Move in the code, without calling the
boost::move function on the return values. I think I've proven that it
wouldn't, and that the boost::move call is required to reap any benefit
from emulated move semantics.
- -- 
Chad Nelson
Oak Circle Software, Inc.
*
*
*
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAkvfTvUACgkQp9x9jeZ9/wQoHQCfbrKGlR9FmpWGqy6BgGAZ4bUU
WnkAnj/5xtmx9JnfOpB3qri9XphBLY5V
=g1q3
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----