Boost logo

Boost :

Subject: Re: [boost] [xint] Third release is ready, requesting preliminary review
From: Chad Nelson (chad.thecomfychair_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-05-03 18:28:47

Hash: SHA1

On 05/03/2010 03:55 PM, vicente.botet wrote:

>> my point is if you want to "understand why" then why don't you look at
>> the sources instead of making guesses? that will answer your
>> question(s) and make the discussion more constructive
> In a post from yesterday it was said that the arithmetic operators
> were not implemented following move semantics. The signatures were
> given, but no replay to this post has been done yet. I'm sure that
> the poster was looking into the sources.

Did I miss a message? I've been trying to answer everything that seemed
to need an answer. I don't see any messages that include function
signatures that I didn't respond to...?
- --
Chad Nelson
Oak Circle Software, Inc.
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla -


Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at