Boost logo

Boost :

Subject: Re: [boost] [xint] Third release is ready, requesting preliminary review
From: DE (satan66613_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-05-04 03:29:03

on 03.05.2010 at 23:55
 vicente.botet wrote :
> In a post from yesterday it was said that the arithmetic operators
> were not implemented following move semantics. The signatures were
> given, but no replay to this post has been done yet. I'm sure that
> the poster was looking into the sources.

actually i don't see a reason to implement them that way
rather they should be implemented either of two ways

  type operator@(type, const type&);
  type operator#(const type&, const type&);

but not simultaneously
in the first case move semantics will take place where appropriate

if you notice a grammar mistake or weird phrasing in my message
please point it out

Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at