Re: [boost] spoiled function declarations

Subject: Re: [boost] spoiled function declarations
From: Chad Nelson (chad.thecomfychair_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-05-05 10:22:01

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 05/05/2010 09:27 AM, Lorenzo Caminiti wrote:

> I have been looking to which Boost libraries provide an interface that
> "spoils" usual C++ function declaration using macros. So far I found
> that both Boost.ConceptCheck and Boost.Parameter replace usual C++
> function declaration using macros (see sample code below).
> 
> Do you know of any other Boost library that "spoils" usual C++
> function declaration?

In XInt (not yet an official Boost library), I use macros to define a
few fixed_integer operators. Why? Is that a problem?
- -- 
Chad Nelson
Oak Circle Software, Inc.
*
*
*
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAkvhfwgACgkQp9x9jeZ9/wRojQCgh+67NmOGszWv2h3qdVtYjMCH
CXYAoMXMDcL+y8I95cSvP1WMw5QMEL+F
=lDFM
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----