Subject: Re: [boost] spoiled function declarations
From: Steven Watanabe (watanabesj_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-05-05 10:24:37
Chad Nelson wrote:
> On 05/05/2010 09:27 AM, Lorenzo Caminiti wrote:
>> I have been looking to which Boost libraries provide an interface that
>> "spoils" usual C++ function declaration using macros. So far I found
>> that both Boost.ConceptCheck and Boost.Parameter replace usual C++
>> function declaration using macros (see sample code below).
>> Do you know of any other Boost library that "spoils" usual C++
>> function declaration?
> In XInt (not yet an official Boost library), I use macros to define a
> few fixed_integer operators. Why? Is that a problem?
No. This is somewhat different because it's an implementation
detail of your library.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk