Re: [boost] spoiled function declarations

Subject: Re: [boost] spoiled function declarations
From: Steven Watanabe (watanabesj_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-05-05 10:24:37

AMDG

Chad Nelson wrote:
> On 05/05/2010 09:27 AM, Lorenzo Caminiti wrote:
>   
>> I have been looking to which Boost libraries provide an interface that
>> "spoils" usual C++ function declaration using macros. So far I found
>> that both Boost.ConceptCheck and Boost.Parameter replace usual C++
>> function declaration using macros (see sample code below).
>>
>> Do you know of any other Boost library that "spoils" usual C++
>> function declaration?
>>     
>
> In XInt (not yet an official Boost library), I use macros to define a
> few fixed_integer operators. Why? Is that a problem?

No.  This is somewhat different because it's an implementation
detail of your library.

In Christ,
Steven Watanabe