Re: [boost] [xint] Third release is ready, requesting preliminary review

Subject: Re: [boost] [xint] Third release is ready, requesting preliminary review
From: Chad Nelson (chad.thecomfychair_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-05-05 15:15:12

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 05/05/2010 11:06 AM, Stewart, Robert wrote:

>>> I didn't see the implementation of those, so I assumed that
>>> they were declarations of non-inlined functions.
>>
>> I believe they are, but I also believe that the compiler is smart
>> enough to change them to inlined functions. It wouldn't be any
>> major difficulty to make that explicit though.

[...]

> Having found the definition of compare() for a previous post, I have
> now found the definition of those operators.  Since they are in a
> .cpp file, they cannot be inlined.  You need to move them to
> integer.hpp (or integer.ipp, if you prefer) for that.

I've just read the back-and-forth on the subject. I *did* assume that
the compiler was smart enough to inline them anyway, but I've already
agreed to mark them inline, which will require putting them in a header
file. So there's no need to argue about it. :-)
- -- 
Chad Nelson
Oak Circle Software, Inc.
*
*
*
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAkvhw8AACgkQp9x9jeZ9/wQEcwCeJfin1S0C5dgRRkVk066qQA6x
UloAoMMCbtJ0CpLhx4LGS+FZTEhWzpcY
=s2PQ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----