Subject: Re: [boost] [xint] Third release is ready, requesting preliminary review
From: Chad Nelson (chad.thecomfychair_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-05-05 15:15:12
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On 05/05/2010 11:06 AM, Stewart, Robert wrote:
>>> I didn't see the implementation of those, so I assumed that
>>> they were declarations of non-inlined functions.
>> I believe they are, but I also believe that the compiler is smart
>> enough to change them to inlined functions. It wouldn't be any
>> major difficulty to make that explicit though.
> Having found the definition of compare() for a previous post, I have
> now found the definition of those operators. Since they are in a
> .cpp file, they cannot be inlined. You need to move them to
> integer.hpp (or integer.ipp, if you prefer) for that.
I've just read the back-and-forth on the subject. I *did* assume that
the compiler was smart enough to inline them anyway, but I've already
agreed to mark them inline, which will require putting them in a header
file. So there's no need to argue about it. :-)
Oak Circle Software, Inc.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----