Subject: Re: [boost] [Booster] Or boost is useless for library developers
From: Artyom (artyomtnk_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-05-18 11:03:47
> Asio addressed such issues in 1.43. Has that resolved
> the problem you mentioned?
No I didn't yet.
> Furthermore, did you test
> performance of the two designs? That is, what was the
> performance cost of using pimpls versus not? It is
> often reasonable to trade space for performance.
The difference does not exits. Why? Because the major
cost in such libraries are system calls that are heavy. Inlining
does not really help unless there are very few instructions in the code.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk