Subject: Re: [boost] Can Boost accept libraries that works only with C++0x compilers?
From: Daniel James (dnljms_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-05-18 13:24:10
On 18 May 2010 15:56, vicente.botet <vicente.botet_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> In order to have the best of both worlds, what do you think about start accepting libraries that are portable on C++0x compilers? This could be released as a separated package, that will, of course, depend on the current Boost package.
I think we'd have to see what the library does, and why it requires
C++0x to do it before deciding. There's not much point in considering
this until it's likely that such a library will be accepted. But if
one is accepted, then it doesn't necessarily have to be distributed
separately since we already have libraries with different requirements
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk