|
Boost : |
Subject: Re: [boost] [Booster] Or boost is useless for library developers
From: Rene Rivera (grafikrobot_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-05-19 12:37:44
On 5/19/2010 11:19 AM, David Abrahams wrote:
> At Wed, 19 May 2010 07:19:13 -0400, Stewart, Robert wrote:
>>
>> ...there is value in having an autoconfig-style tool that uses
>> tests to determine platform capabilities and produce a report of
>> needed configuration options.
>
> This is one argument for trying to switch to CMake, which has that
> functionality.
And so does Boost Build now.. or at least close to it. We are in the
process of implementing the Boost Test config script with the new BB
functionality.
-- -- Grafik - Don't Assume Anything -- Redshift Software, Inc. - http://redshift-software.com -- rrivera/acm.org (msn) - grafik/redshift-software.com -- 102708583/icq - grafikrobot/aim,yahoo,skype,efnet,gmail
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk