Subject: Re: [boost] [Booster] Or boost is useless for library developers
From: Nigel Stewart (nigels_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-05-21 11:19:29
>> I don't see any reason today use anything but shared libraries.
>> We in 2010.
> There are many good reasons to use static libraries,
> but that's irrelevant to this discussion.
I think it is relevant. So there ought to be
a different set of libraries for each version of gcc?
For each combination of BOOST_NO_IOSTREAM,
BOOST_NO_TYPEID and so on and so on? For the
misguided sake of an ABI?
I've used boost for quite a while but never been
interested in using the generic shared libraries.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk