Re: [boost] [Review] Formal Review: Boost.Move

Subject: Re: [boost] [Review] Formal Review: Boost.Move
From: Steven Watanabe (watanabesj_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-05-22 19:17:58

AMDG

Terry Golubiewski wrote:
> I agree that boost::rv<> should not be in the move_detail namespace.
> I found using the macros to be annoying and did not use them.
> I did add...
>
>  typedef boost::rv<T>& rv_ref;
>
> ... to my movable classes for convenience.
> I never felt a need for const_rv_ref though.

The main reason for using the macros is
to get an automatic upgrade to real
rvalue references when they are available.

In Christ,
Steven Watanabe