Boost :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Subject: Re: [boost] [Review] Formal Review: Boost.Move
From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-05-23 07:58:42

Next message: Alexander Arhipenko: "Re: [boost] [config] Major upgrade to Boost.Config symbol visibility macros"
Previous message: David Abrahams: "Re: [boost] [config] Major upgrade to Boost.Config symbol visibility macros"
In reply to: vicente.botet: "Re: [boost] [Review] Formal Review: Boost.Move"
Next in thread: Steven Watanabe: "Re: [boost] [Review] Formal Review: Boost.Move"

At Sat, 22 May 2010 17:00:13 +0200,
vicente.botet wrote:
>
> I see that there is not too much participation on the review of this
> library. Either people is not interested on Move semantics (I
> doubt), either they are interested but they have an implementation
> provided by some compilers in C++0x.

I'm quite interested but I'm buried in ryppl development ATM.

-- 
Dave Abrahams           Meet me at BoostCon: http://www.boostcon.com
BoostPro Computing
http://www.boostpro.com

Next message: Alexander Arhipenko: "Re: [boost] [config] Major upgrade to Boost.Config symbol visibility macros"
Previous message: David Abrahams: "Re: [boost] [config] Major upgrade to Boost.Config symbol visibility macros"
In reply to: vicente.botet: "Re: [boost] [Review] Formal Review: Boost.Move"
Next in thread: Steven Watanabe: "Re: [boost] [Review] Formal Review: Boost.Move"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk